Audrey Beedle
COMM 211 – Reflection 3
The
reading and class discussion on Jihad vs. McWorld covered the conflict between
the “Jihad World” whose main priority is self identity and preservation, and
the “McWorld” whose main priority is profit and globalization. It is clearly a multi-faceted problem without
a simple resolution. In turn, it creates
a dialectical relationship between the western world and the developing world,
although it is not limited to categorized by territorial borders. I find the most problematic issue to be with
the extremists on either end of the spectrum.
This is where violence usually occurs from the Jihad world and where
assimilation is forced from the McWorld.
It is a combination of the two, working together where we can find peaceful
coexistence.
This
conflict relates to intercultural communication, in the sense that it requires
intercultural competency to solve conflicts with cultures/nations different
than your own. These extremists are some
of the most inter-culturally incompetent people in the world, who do not
understand any ideas that conflict with their own, thus there is a lack of
tolerance and an influx of violence, discrimination, and ignorance. As a native-born American and part of what is
referred to as the “Western World” or perhaps the McWorld, it is very difficult
to understand what it would be like to be living in a developing country and
trying to preserve your native culture and practices in a changing and
globalizing world. I am fully aware of
the western influence on the rest of the world, and how it can be extremely
harmful to other societies and seem to have sense of forced assimilation. On the other hand, these developing countries
who are trying to resist globalization are more than willing to accept any
economic benefits that may come with this relationship with the western world,
making it unclear where the line should be drawn and how much influence they
are “ok” with receiving from more developed countries. I thin it is only natural for traditional
cultures to eventually change and modernize, with the rest of the world. This constant conflict between self-identity
preservation and the spread of modernization through globalization is getting
worse and worse, as we can see with the various accounts of Jihad violence in
the current news. I hope that one day
the world can come to a peaceful coexistence and understanding of each culture
and this can only be achieved through intercultural competence.
Yes, there are so many fights that are related to Jihad violence. I hope they stop doing that as it is not worth for them to even sacrifice their life.
ReplyDeleteI agree there is no easy fix for the tension between self identity and cultural preservation on the one hand and profit-driven globalization on the other hand. Nice of you to show it as a dialectical relationship between the developed world and the developing. You did a good job tying back this tension to the need for intercultural communication competency.
ReplyDelete