COMM 211 Reflection 5 Chapter 6 Kelli Green
I found the
positions on perception of language in chapter six very interesting. The
Nominalist Position states that perception is not shaped by the particular
language we speak. This position concludes that we all have the same ideas and
thoughts that are just expressed in different languages or channels. The
Relativist Position concludes the exact opposite: that the particular language
we speak, especially the structure of the language, determine our thought
patterns, our perceptions of reality, and ultimately, important cultural
components. The Qualified Relativist Position somewhat combines the two already
mentioned. This position is a moderate view of the relationship between
language and perception, saying they are related but not dependent on each
other. According to the Qualified Relativist Position, our culture has
instilled language habits in us from the time we first learn to speak that
likely shape our orientation to the world and the people and objects we
encounter.
Living in a
different culture and speaking a different language changed my perception. I do
not think that my basic thoughts and ideas changed, however. Speaking a
different language makes the speaker think differently and take into account
the culture that the language belongs to. Body language, thought universal, can
also be translated very differently in different cultures. While a kiss on the
cheek was a normal greeting in Peru, many people would consider it an invasion
of privacy in other cultures. I believe that the Qualified Relativist Position
best explains the relationship between culture and language. The habits that
I’ve learned since growing up in the Midwest of the United States affect how I
speak and treat people. When I travel to different areas or other countries, my
habits do not change even if the language I am speaking does. My interactions
with different cultures will affect my perception of the world, but my
perception is not entirely dependent on the language I speak.
I think you captured the essences of nominalist and relativist positions on perception of language very well. I agree the relativist view makes more sense. You did a very good job of explaining (using your own experience) how speaking a different language might make you see the world differently.
ReplyDelete