When I first think of pop culture, I think of different kinds of music,
movies and celebrities. Then, I start
think of money. Isn’t pop culture just a
nice way of saying profit? When it comes
to high and low culture, I think the high culture (ballet, literature, etc.)
focuses more on talent and purpose more than being financially successful. On the other hand, I think low culture is the
opposite. Low culture consists of video
games and music, things that don’t having a true purpose behind it. Low culture focuses the attention on the
profit made from the product.
Below I posted a
video of Blake Mycoskie, the founder of the shoe company TOMS. It’s more of a business perspective on the
company but I think it shows positive and negative qualities of pop culture. A few positives, for every shoe they sell
they give one pair to a child in need. First
and foremost, this is a great cause for giving back, but it also gives America
a good reputation by giving back to other cultures across the world. Another positive is they connect with these
other cultures to design different items to sell, like jewelry and other
accessories. A negative, the company is
actually taking away local markets. By
TOMS coming in and giving a free pair of shoes to children in need, the surrounding
markets are briefly defeated. The founder
has also been questioned about his sincerity for giving back based on his
material goods. Although this private
company seems to have other cultures best interests in mind, behind the scenes
are they truly passionate about helping kids or are they in it for the profit
side?
I like the way you analyzed the pros and cons of Toms shoes company their marketing strategies. I personally think it will be better for Toms continue doing what they are doing right now because they are actually helping children to have better life, as well as they have a very good marketing strategies which, there will have more people buy shoes from them and many children will get benefits from benefits shoes we purchased.
ReplyDelete